April 23, 2004

April 22, 2004



  •    Notes From the


    Garden Journal


     


     


    Death to Accordions (well most of them)


     


    This evening I want to talk about an experience I had recently. Not too long ago a friend and I were walking out of a restaurant after some fine roadkill. Okay, it wasn't roadkill. As we were walking to our cars there suddenly began this strange, hauntingly hokey noise coming from somewhere--- and everywhere. Beginning faintly, this noise began to grow louder and clearer, seemingly omnipresent in its hellish echo as it gaily bounced off of buildings with vocals that carried like the faint death-rattle yodels of an old country singer or perhaps even the Ricola man. Eventually the source of the sound reminiscent of the film Mars Attacks emerged into view with the punctuation of an ambulance,  the sounds finally coming together somewhat intelligibly enough for us to realize the altogether sad, sad truth; it was another case of a helpless soul going by on the street playing obnoxiously loud accordion music. Someone...who needed help ("I see accordion music people...they're everywhere...they don't even know that they're killing us with laughter"). Let’s be honest, this music is gay, okay folks. I’m usually not so direct, but I think the public sanity is at stake here. But I’ll explain why I think this and who the guilty parties are.


     


    So you’re driving along and come to a stop light. Someone pulls up next to you. It is a sleak, fast new sports car, in which the driver is wearing a designer Italian shirt and dark shades. The essence of coolness... until you start hearing a noise… this sound coming around you…where is it coming from? You suddenly have flashbacks of the Fajitas you had for lunch and begin to wonder if maybe they were tainted until you realize that sound... is a style of music called Tejano or Latino (a traditional style of Mexican music with b-movie pop music undertones and a Country & Western beat), and it's emanating awkwardly like an albatross from the stylish sports car next to you. So, I know what you guys are thinking- and it’s sad we can’t even be music critics anymore without offending the culture-fascists. So before some of you get your feathers ruffled, you ought to frankly know these sentiments also apply to that excruciatingly cheesy Italian and Greek "wedding music," as well as the Yugoslav and German "beer-polka" music “styles” out there. We uhm...just don't run into quite as many Yugoslavs in Texas for some reason (nevermind they aren't even called that anymore)...maybe we should get a federal grant and look into why that is and try to change it for the sake of fairness... 


     


    Now it should be noted that the accordion is the fault of the Germans. Invented in Berlin and later refined in Vienna as we now know it (and have come to love it) by a fellow by the name of Cyril Demian, who was the first to patent it back in 1829 (one hundred years before the American stock market crash -coincidence?). It was further refined later and in 1850 the piano accordion came into existence, much to the chagrin of serious music aficionados everywhere. Blogbat is 1/2 German, so I think I'm being fair here. The apparent dirty little secret out there is that really the only style of music ever to reasonably make good use of the accordion since the creation of the instrument is the French. Well okay, so the Cajuns did something fun with it too, but there again you have the French behind the whole affair. And you know I haven't had too many good things to say about the French of late, so again you can see I'm pretty fair. The French do do two things fairly well in addition to certain beverages and cheeses: they mastered the accordion (now that’s a goal) and they can get away with actually expecting people in their country to speak the language, something we for some reason are no longer afforded here. (My grandparents learned it- I even hear folks speak English in Katmandu Nepal, so what's the problem?).


     


    Here's my final word on this (it's really a plea from all that is sane in the world): if any of you Tejano and Beer-Barrel Polka fans (you know who you are, ja!) happen to be reading this, please do one thing for the Blogbat (you know, because you luv him n stuff): don't rush out and buy a 1500$US stereo system for your car and blast your music in public. 1. The girls aren't impressed. Any attention you get from them is purely out of sympathy. 2. You just look to everybody like a complete idiot. In fact, it really reminds us of something akin to Peewee Herman in a sports car. I am telling you this because Blogbat cares: you are only two steps away from coke bottle glasses, dark socks and plaid shorts my friend! Now granted, I'm sure a few of you just dig the accordion and that's okay- some people actually go to Weird Al concerts, too. But if you must Accordion, all I ask is that you accordion responsibly. Put on some romantic French dinner music or... try some wild Cajun! Sure Zydeco may not be trippy hipness party music (neither exactly is Tejano or the "ja-ja-fräulein" Beer music). In fact it’s probably more like- at home with the old farts, the family already plastered sittin' by the bayou- music, but at least it’s usually sans les chanteurs and let’s be honest; it brings images of blackened shrimpies to mind. Git soma dat an some rice! Now isn’t that a good thing? Go ahead, admit it!  But remember kids, French or Cajun are no better than the other accordion styles in terms of viability when publicly broadcasted from your car if hipness is your statement. Of course, if common courtesy is your statement, then no style of music would be viable when broadcast in such a manner. Just a word to the wise


     


    -Blogbat


     


     









    Notes from the Garden Journal



     


     

April 21, 2004


  • ISSUES


     



    note: if you can't see the above image, click here


     


    Revise and Hush. See no evil, hear no evil. E.g. when they came for the neighbor on my left, I did nothing. When they came for the neighbor on my right, I did nothing. When they came for me no one was left to help me. Recent news has seemed to really spotlight the danger of censoring the truly evil things that are being done or have been done throughout the world. To truly have any conviction about the evil we are fighting, we need to know what that kind of evil is all about. This is where the danger of both revisionist history and whitewashing of current events come in. We saw it (or rather didn’t see it) in Fallujah with the four American contractors burned and dragged through the streets and whose pieces were then hung from a bridge as the perpetrators celebrated in the morbid style of their cousins the so-called Palestinians.


     


    According to a report by Fox News' Anita Vogel, Google was recently fingered for not removing an anti-Semitic link that wound up at the top of a list of search results for the word “Jew”. Google  tried to explain it all with this:


     


    "Google said it found "Jew Watch" offensive, but had no plans to remove it. Company executives said their search-result ranking system is based on complex mathematical formulas, and that results are never manipulated by Google."


     


    Sounds like USAA, my auto insurance company (at least for now).


     


    So we know that is a lot of manure that Google is feeding us on that point. Instead, they should have pointed out that this should be noted by all as a symptom of a troubling trend in our world today and that we had better wake up to it. Anti-Semitism is on the rise and we need to know it is or folks will wind up like they did the last time it was fashionable to put our heads in the sand.


     


    Of course Google can't be blamed for their spinelessness; it is the mode du jour, after all. And then you have Microsoft at the other extreme which suddenly had an attack of sensitivity after all this time, wanting to remove a few fonts from our computers because it was found to contain offensive symbols and they wished to remove them in what really has become the first real instance of the PC police literally reaching into personal computers and altering files deemed by them too offensive for the average person to even have or look at (and as usual, they go after the symbolic). Forget the occasional content on their own MSN site which might offend large groups of people...or those people who used to work for all those small companies who had their intellectual property basically stolen by Microsoft as it gobbled them up like hapless worms. So Microsoft decided to get rid of the swastikas in one of their fonts residing on millions of their customers' computers. And for good measure (I suppose to not offend the Islamo-fascists) removed the Stars of David from that font as well. I must say I oppose actions such as the removal of those font-embedded characters (and any other symbols). For the same reason I would oppose any similarly symbolic (pardon the pun) deeds. Despite the beneficial side affect that it shows Microsoft and other PC-Tree hugging companies and individuals for the dolts they are, with regard to the NAZI symbols, the down side of removing every vestage of the evil we conqured throughout history is that these Swastikas are a part of that history we must not forget. Ever. What is it that the human race said after the horrors of NAZI Germany were exposed to the world? We all said, "Never again". Never forget the very face of evil, the feeling of that era, that time. If we forget, we will not see the warning signs next time, and we will become too proud to think it could ever happen again. For history to benefit anyone it must include both the heroes and the villains, otherwise why even discuss the heroes when the heroes look as if they were merely beating the air? It makes such a conflict when viewed though those goggles (or Google, if you wish)both senseless and stupid. When your child asks, "what is evil?" are you going to say, “it’s just bad, trust me” or are you going to point to them an example so it sinks in deep and they too come to the realization for another generation that evil is not a good thing to tolerate, ever. 


     


    I was recently at a famous Civil War museum in the South in which they obviously had spent quite a large bit of money with gorgeous murals, souvenirs and literature. There was only one problem. Nowhere in the literature (and scarcely found anywhere else) was there any indication that the battle to save the Union ever had an opponent. There was scarce representation of the word "Confederacy" or images of Confederate flags or even Confederate soldiers. Now, the North won the war and slaves were freed, which is a good thing. But tell me how it is good? If I am a 12 year old in this museum, I want you to show me. Or else I'm thinking it was some strange affair about soldiers in blue fighting other soldiers in blue with the exact same flag, leaving me at best confused- and since I feel like I can't find out what this is all about in a museum dedicated to the subject matter, forget about it, I didn't want to know in the first place. So any lesson to be learned about human value is out the window. I can hear the kid saying now, “So am I supposed to take your  word for it? Why are you afraid to show me then?”


     


    When we practice revisionist history to eliminate our foes retroactively, we deprive ourselves of what we learned from that chapter in our history. Because of this, much like the fool who burns his hands on hot coals and chooses to forget about the experience and then burns himself again, we are doomed ourselves to repeat the chapter. Those who believe we can hide from our history are the same who believe that history just happens and is not brought about and thus, they are a danger to us all.


     


    While it goes without saying the "Jew Watch" links in Google are to a terrible and evil site, let us always count the blessing of being reminded in sufficient time just what it was we put down in World War II. Stories of NAZI Germany’s evils weren't just a bunch of unsupported propaganda assertions for our side about the character of the NAZI. We really had a reason to fight. The NAZIs were the personification of Evil, as the Anti-Semitic link reminds us. I do support having the link to the site blocked from younger eyes though, which can be actualized when you use Google's family-friendly "SafeSearch" search filter with the option set for “strict filtering”, because not all ages are ready to be exposed to this depth of depravity. When set, this setting does prevent the “Jew Watch” site from being listed. But otherwise I say let the link remain. It tells us there is yet work to be done and we’d better wake up to it.


     


    -Blogbat


     


    ISSUES

April 18, 2004


  •  



    Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeets Pooooooooooooooooooooooooo!


     


    Hey, I know it’s been awhile, but Blogbat has been, as they say in Engrish, vely vely busy.  My time on the web has been confined to creating a web presence for a new venture with which I have joined forces. Naturally, between this and time spent at stylish outdoor cafés in Highland Park waiting on colleagues, it has been a busy ordeal. I shall not even enter into bemoaning the many trials by the pool which must be suffered on a daily basis these days. Not that things such as the matter of slain CIA spook Mike Spann and the common practices of uprisings from Mazar-e Sharif to Fallujah after the apparent subjugation of enemy combatants has ever grown dim in our rearview mirrors. In terms of this, it always continues to be of interest to me, because these events should not necessarily come as any surprise for those who are equally in tune with the schemes and natural tunings of their enemies, as they are with their own pre-drawn playbooks, even as truly well drawn as they have been.


     


    I know I promised a few weeks ago a revealing and engrossing spiel (spiel was my word exactly) on all things Bin Laden, but my timing was off and I need to wait until all or more of my ducks are in a row if you will. It is a messy kind of bird though. Kind of tangly, the whole bin Laden affair, and I have heard that I sometimes can be a bit of a bull in a china shop at times, so I’m sitting on my observations there for a bit until I know the best way with which to discuss the various complexities at play in this. I do appreciate the insights given by a Ukrainian friend recently, though. I know it is a letdown for the kind reader, as it was made more than plain to me by the ensuing spike in traffic during the period of my past few blogs thereafter followed by a just as sudden drop of the same which indicated to me there was at least some anticipation there, unrequited, if you will. My site had a lot of interest particularly after the whole Libya process where I spilled the beans about their intentions to pass nuclear technology on to other parties, rather than use it, two days before news of this hit the front pages. I really have had a love-hate relationship with such things for some time. Not the Libya thing, rather the lack of surprise to it. With a lot of things It’s a little like watching a video of mice in a maze…that you’ve seen before. I would say this is largely because people always telegraph to you what they are really all about; we just sometimes don’t want to acknowledge it. Some are loud, some are subtle, all telegraph. It’s hard-wired. I suppose that's it in most cases.


     


    But enough for human affairs for this blog. One of the things recently which has captivated my interest has been a strange little desert bug called the Camel Spider or the proper family name, solifugae (which sounds like a bad Engrish sentence. For example, “sol-if-you-gay, you supposed go find gay lestelaunt downtown for yuh flied lice”). Not that I don’t have a life, but sometimes the weirder aspects of science really attract my attention. Sort of like the creature known as John Kerry. With an overbite to rival that of Hillary Clinton's, the Solifugae, while neither spiders nor (dare I point this out) camels, are actually a type of crusties which scurry about at upwards of 10mph and are found lurking about at night in the middle-east as well as wandering into its place of public prominence vis-à-vis the Iraq war. But he has cousins closer to home, too. In fact, he collects bug-welfare cheques in the sands of the great state of Nevada (“great,” is of course loosely defined here. Nevada, where the motto is, “Hey, at least we aren’t California!”). But the camel spider is something different in that unlike his cousins the spider and the scorpion, the solifugae do not trade in chemical or high-tech weapons. They rather overpower their adversaries with the brute force of their huge chompers (Hint to Mr. Rumsfeld who is slowly coming around to this, I hear). The site to which I have provided a link above also has a link to some vely intelesting video of these tenacious teethers.


     


    -Blogbat


     


     


    OKAY! So sticking to my day job: Here's some of what went down today...


     


    1. Got a Starbuck's Frap


    2. Let the dog out. (yes, I did it, "woof, woof woof") 


    3. Picked up relative visiting from Florida


    4. Came Home


    5. Visited and had dinner and visited some more


    6. Let the dog out yet again (because I care...about my carpet). (yes, I did it, "woof, woof woof") 


    7. Began this blog


    8.Here I am, wasn't that fun?


     


     


     


     


     


    This list is sponsored by the National Abridgate Foundation, sponsoring selected truncated works since 1974.


     


    "Give me ambiguity...or give me something else."


    ...There's more, but whoever leaves the lights on for wayward waterbugs anymore?


     


     


    The daily Poo


    “Look stimpy! Eeet's Poooooo!”

April 4, 2004


  • Some holiday humour from Blogbat’s mind that appears to have had too little to do on this, the coolest 23-hour date this century: 04.04.04 (I had to mark the occasion with a post). Blogbat returns to serious writing shortly…Osama will still be there in his hole like most bearded invertebrates.

March 31, 2004

  • noch mehr...


     


    Blogbat will be away for a few days, but when he returns he will discuss the matter of Osama bin Mohammed bin Laden, his connections with the Chechen separatist rebels in the former Soviet Union and how it is important for the West


     


    -Blogbat

March 27, 2004

  • ISSUES


     


     


    Making War with Lilliputians (and other giants)


     


    It is indeed doubtless that guerilla-cell tactics have become the adopted choice as the mode de jours for our enemies. It has proven a successful means of overcoming US supremacy as done in Viet-nam and on the first volley of the latest chapter as played out on the American east coast on September 11, 2001.


     


    There is also little doubt (except perhaps among those of the Far Left in this country) that this chapter in US history is about our very survival not just as a nation and a people, but as individuals who happen to live in this land which stretches from sea to shining sea. The question remains (sadly and much to my dismay) whether we will fight it with all of our collective heart and soul, as our grandfathers did 60 years ago in WWII or if we think we have become so good that we can simply sit in our togas while making symbolic gestures with plenty of offense abroad making a good show, but very little defense at home with open borders and a rampant ACLU still running around loose in the barnyard, stirring up trouble for the farmer as the storm approaches.  And to make matters worse, we now have the threat of nuclear attack that is practically imminent: the terrorists want to, we are just really waiting for when the “want to” turns to “can”. While setting up radiological detection devices sounds “cool” to those who want to see something done, they run an intolerable risk of alerting us to the presence of such a device far too late to safely intercept it.


     


    Where is the war on terror headed?


     


    As springtime approaches, we all have many things on our minds beside the overly discussed War on Terror, which square-faced talking heads on television never tire of talking of in worthless detail, at length, ad nauseam. Don’t these people ever get out? We might wonder if they even notice the fresh grass and green leaves budding here in the northern hemisphere. Or for that matter the charming breeze which now once again caresses and feeds us, filled with birdsong and the fragrance of springtime flowers. Do these pasty pontificators ever stand outside and feel the rhythm around them, the nourishment of sunshine- the way of things? You don’t suppose they ever stand in the square as people come and go and wonder what normal living is like…I know I would be astonished if one were to find such a thing. I, like most rational people would much rather sit in the grass and watch the clouds roll by or go see a movie with some friends than delay the flow of life for such vain babblings as did Bush act enough or not act enough, did Clinton miss a chance or was he busy seizing other “opportunities”. As I have already stated, we are all sick of hearing about the disjointed affairs (no pun intended) of fat bureaucrats, since it is far too reminiscent of fat government orgies that were going on in Rome even as the barbarians had already broken the outer parameters and were imminently approaching. 


     


    So I’ll just write a quick sketch of my impressions of world events (nothing major at all) and then I’ll go. Before you jump back and hiss at the true choice of topic in this blog like a vampire might at holy water, just know this is far from a dry recitation of the controvertible- it is instead a very wet opinion piece dripping with relevance (if not some wit and sarcasm) for easier digestion. This is not merely a blog intended as a collage of painfully dusty sources and such that more resemble someone’s collection of dead bugs. In other words, not another incredibly painful and arduous item found on campuses, Sunday morning talk shows or for instance the biblical book of Numbers. (I’m not sure if the previous biblical reference has already qualified me as a wacko or not.) Academia and talk shows are usually concerned with aimless policy for policy’s sake- it makes them feel smarter than they are, and helps them avoid the more dangerous waters of sticking one's neck out. One additional note regarding what you will be reading here, even though this is not a detailed blog (i.e. a blog that has been footnoted to death), you should rest assured much time has been invested in information-gathering regarding what will be discussed below. I leave it up to you to research the matter to your satisfaction. Thinking adults are in such short supply these days, after all.


     


    So already I have managed to drag this out, haven’t I? The point of this blog is again perhaps to tell you how Blogbat thinks the War on Terror et cetera will develop in the coming years. So without any more tripe, below are my thoughts, as brief as possible, and conclusions on the matter, at no extra charge. It is for the purpose of getting you thinking and perhaps doing some investigating as well. If, after reading you come to the conclusion that I am wrong on a few if not many points, you’re in good company; I’d rather hope to be, too. Peeing in summertime Cheerios does not win one a lot of favor in times of war or of peace.


     


    In a few years I think you will see this war heading into the annuls of history as one of the three great ones of human history (yeah, sure a lot of people have been saying this…and they all live somewhere in Georgia, right?), with far more at stake than we could have feared in the last two and certainly more than we currently accept is such at the hands of Islamic terrorists. But what a lot of people aren’t saying or suggesting is that this war, like the movie “The Crying Game,” will have a twist in the end that may seem to come for many of us from a far stranger than fiction source. But I am not the only one seeing this far ahead, there are a few “respectable” souls out there likewise commenting on this. But far more dryly . The well-spring and source of inspiration for the battle lying ahead can only be found expounded upon properly within the pages of the infamous historical hardcover, “The Black Book of Communism” and the horrors therein described. Sound crazy? Sure, but read on.


     


    The Empire Strikes Back


     


    First, one should ask why the war seems to us in so many ways a confusing, blurry bird. Our enemies seem almost nearly as difficult as our friends to define. So many strange shadows, it’s honestly hard to make any sense of its iterations until sometimes long after the fact. As if we were fighting against ghosts, we have been pursuing manifestations of symptoms, nailing down chairs, but as yet not exorcising the house. This is understandable, since most of us haven’t seen the big part of the puzzle yet. Part of which that the US be sent on a fool’s errand chasing after faceless Muslim extremists until the time was right and the appropriate interests were consolidated and fortified. A Communist plot afoot? No, not completely. Nor is it completely the two-faced EU or for that matter Muslim terrorists. There are definately different agendas at play in the Axis against which we are fighting, which happen to coincide in some of their goals, and perhaps in some instances consciously overlap. The fact that more than a few leaders in the radical movements were at some point trained and equipped by Leftist interests is only par for the course. Not to say that the Muslim extremists alone aren’t a dangerous enemy - indeed, they have proven to be this. But these are the saboteurs, not the torpedo. blogbat feels that at the point the afore-mentioned torpedo is made ready (if it is allowed to be) quite a few will be astonished as a phoenix of worldwide dimensions raises high its scarred, ugly head, strong and ready to, in the hopes of some, overwhelm America and her allies. Perhaps if we are lucky this won’t happen during the summertime seasons, bringing our plans of picnics and art exhibitions to ruin.


     


    So you think this is utter rubbish, I know. You weren’t there when I was sharing with my close friends in 2000 and early 2001 that a major attack on the US and pursuant conflict was impending. Nor were you there when I shared with my friends after September 11 that the war begun would go through Afghanistan then Iraq, finding its way to the doorsteps China, Russia and their axis. That our friends would betray us or that Chinese intelligence officers were involved in the very planning of the 9/11 attacks (as claimed later by a high-ranking Chinese defector, as well as internal PLA and Chinese government documents and teaching materials).


     


    I am not saying that Mr. China did it in the green room with a model airplane, but I will say they were a “contributor”. In fact, CIA documents mention several countries which have aided Bin Laden’s Al Queda network. A list which, if not blacked out for public scrutiny might raise quite a stir among likely voters. Of course, I understand we are trying to leverage many of them- the countries, that is. It is working to some degree in Pakistan for the time-being…I suppose. We, for instance let Pakistan’s leader General Pervez Musharraf off the hook for practically single-handedly guaranteeing that a nuclear holocaust killing millions is in the cards somewhere in the not too distant future in the middle east…or Europe…or in the Americas. But we will have Bin Laden…


     


    Blogbat also thinks that activity in South- and Central America is very important right now. It will be brought to fruition soon, too. This is brilliant chess, friends. I just wish it weren’t. And the figs are ripe.


     


    The irony is that the Islamists, who have loathed communism for its godless ways, have been duped into performing the ultimate fool’s errand. Naturally, these Islamists stand to lose as well, they just don’t know it.


     


     


    So what do we know at present? It is known as a matter of public record that the giants China and Russia, who passed their technology on to Pakistan, India and Iran then saw Pakistan actively supply nuclear and deadly missile technology (some of which stolen from the US) to North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Libya and other axis powers (who in turn, it is reasonably assumed will further promote proliferation once they arrive at the capability), while at the same time pretending to negotiate their disarmament. So we have no doubt that nuclear proliferation was not accidental, but instead deliberate and calculated, though it is not completely having to do with us: it must be noted for proper understanding that while Russia and China may have signed an agreement or two against American “hegemony”, it is not all chocolates and roses between those two Asian superpowers. Russia and China may be on the same page with regard to more than a few things, but they are still two very big fish in a small (when you count just the other countries) Asian pond. An example of this is the fact that Pakistan and China both have boarder disputes with India, which has leaned more heavily on Russia for its support (and Blogbat thinks neither Musharraf or Vajpayee is his own man at the end of the day, either. They are prostitutes to the hurt of their peoples). Nevertheless, while some of the weapons proliferation may serve two purposes- both to deal with the balance of power in Asia and the matter of Washingtonian affairs, it cannot be disputed that with countries such as Syria, Libya, Iran and North Korea, it leaves things more dangerous for America and more advantageous for her stated common antagonists, Putin and Hu.)


     


    We know that in the late 90’s and in 2000-early 2001 even just months prior to the Chinese attack on an American recon plane over international waters that Chinese generals and leaders alike declared "war with the US (to be) inevitable", and that according to some credible sources, a plan was hatched to use Islamic terrorists piloting planes as weapons in a terrorist attack on America’s financial and political centers in such a way that would prevent a direct and focused response. It is further known that the communist Chinese made it an open aim be ready for direct conflict with the US by 2008 or so. 


     


    We are most likely also aware that during the 90’s while al Qaeda and Islamic Jihad were building worldwide cells and training camps, China and Russia were performing intensive intelligence gathering and building vital strategic ties with a decidedly offensive posture towards US interests, as well as beginning a program of modernization and quelling internal dissidence. In fact, espionage activity has increased, not decreased since the much-heralded end of the Cold War.


     


     


    What of Taiwan? China still thoroughly intends to move in on it, removing the international blemish of their dishonor and humiliation that is Taipei. What will happen to them because of it? Nothing. Probably not even a UN resolution (so even less than what Saddam got from the UN). It will look a little like a rebellious Hong Kong to the rest of the world. Americans have no choice but to let it go. It is a sad thing, a tragic thing to be sure. Much suffering will come about as a result of it, but we will likely have no options here. We sealed the fate of Taiwan decades ago. I have said this for several years now and I am not changing my tune any time soon. Taiwan will feel we have betrayed them in the end, but we will have our own problems and no recourse. Better yet for China if they time it to the period just before the US general elections in order to stir fears of economic upheavals stateside.


     


     


    And Now?


     


    It is probably safe to interpret, as so many already have, the purpose for the timing of those bombs in Spain, especially in light of the political aftermath and statements released by al Qaeda. To pull Spain out of our column by insuring the election of the Communist-socialist José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and a swift policy change as a result, was not the child of a wild-eyed Islamic automaton in a green and black bandana. And most certainly, the calculation did not disappoint. It shows the level of intelligent planning with which this war is being carried out by the other side. Any strategist worth his salt cannot help but abstractly appreciate it in the same sense a geneticist might appreciate the complexities of a bold new virus, while at the same time trying to reverse engineer it in order to eventually defeat it. At the same time, it could also be argued that this is simply a case of one team simply not showing up for the game.


     


    And then there are the players who have swapped jerseys during half-time. And I am not speaking of Spain here, but so many of the other countries as well who have defected, if you will and now play for the cause of Terror, be it islamo-fascist or Communist in nature. We saw the beginnings of this when the UN kicked us off the human rights commission, replacing us with a radical dictatorship. But be warned, we will also most likely be betrayed by some of our closest allies. We will find new ones, I am sure, but don’t be shocked when it happens. Also watch to see who begins pulling investments out of US companies and such in the near future—birds – as well as bats - usually like to hide before the storm


     


     


    So what interests me of late in Libya’s role in a possible future radiological attack somewhere? I have a few things to discuss here, since I still believe they are doing everything but playing straight with us. More insanity from Blogbat, you ask. Have I not read the news the past few months, that Libya gave up their nuclear program and even Blair is chummy with them now? Surely the world watched as they shipped out the last of their dismantled nuclear technology under watch of the IAEA, the UN and other fantastic organizations. Even the US got a look-see in the peephole. This Blogbat, he is crazy, I know, I know. So how about those Libyans? Now they clearly want to play nice, right? I don’t buy it. The truth may be only complicating in its digestion ante bellum. Suppose with me Libya the conduit- not ever the perpetrator- has decided to “came clean” for ignoble purposes. Now looking squeaky-clean before the world prior to some future “event” after covering up those nasty tracks left when said “dirty work” was undergoing. Simply put, let’s hypothesize that technology passed through its borders to be used against Allied targets in what would amount to a “cGy-laundering” scheme.


     


    Sometimes when we deal with governments we forget we are dealing with people. And I don’t recall hearing that Muammar al-Qaddafi was “Born Again” in a roadside conversion during any of his trips to Damascus. I’m not wagering any family heirlooms on that one. Conversely, I would probably be more inclined to bet the farm in the other direction. The argument in favor of Libya is that it has succomed to pressure from the west. Maybe, and I hope so. Hopefully for our sakes however, we and our allies (such that they are) have despite all reports to the contrary, kept a keen intel eye on these particular Lilliputians.


     


    As for the rest of the Lilliputians scattered about in various cesspools around the globe (or hiding behind other giants), it is perhaps wise that Gulliver begins to be less gullible in his travels and understands in a more earnest way that which is truly afoot, if you will. But giants usually are slow to come around.


     


    That is why Blogbat thinks, to be appropriately and solemnly blunt, it’s going to become literally a hell of a war. This time we know that simply “pulling out” is not an option: we cannot pull out of our own country. We will need to bear down and take care of business as our grandfathers and their forefathers did. If we do this, we will also be able to pass our freedom and traditions down as also they did.


     


    So stay tuned for the latest revision of human kind's magnum opus of everything we know being brought to war, and don’t forget to bring along some tea and cake.


     


    -Blogbat


     


    ISSUES

March 25, 2004